A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From March 2014 to April 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) employed the Defendant’s “E Innex” located in Cheongju-si Office D as a female sexual traffic; (b) provided sexual intercourse with male customers by having male customers engage in sexual traffic; (c) received 70,000 won for once sexual traffic from male customers, and (d)0,00 won out of which the Defendant would bring about about KRW 58,50,000, in a way that the Defendant would bring about a fee, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of police officers against F, G, H, I, K, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, and AA;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (e.g., details of crackdown and field photographs);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic by combining the relevant laws with regard to facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture, and Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. The purpose of collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, is to deprive the criminal of unlawful profits from the act in order to eradicate the act, such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts. Thus, the scope of collection is reasonable to deem that the criminal actually acquired profits. However, since the expenses of taxes, etc. paid by the criminal in the course of engaging in the act, such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts, are only one way to consume the money and valuables acquired in return for the brokerage of commercial sex acts or to justify his/her act, the collection shall not be deducted from the amount of collection (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da2223, May 14, 2009). The reason for the crime of sentencing, the details and result of the crime, the period of crime, the period of crime,