logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.11.26 2014고단953
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and February of one year and a fine of KRW 2,00,00.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2012, the Defendant sentenced 6 months of imprisonment and fine 3,00,000 won to the violation of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Offenders at the Changwon District Court on March 30, 2012, and completed the execution of the above imprisonment on April 30, 2012.

On November 20, 1996, the Defendant was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc., and on December 1, 2010, the Busan District Court issued an order to attach an electronic tracking device for five years in accordance with the Act on the Electronic Monitoring of Specific Sexual Offenders’ Location Monitoring at Busan District Court on December 1, 201, and imposed a duty of compliance, such as “from 00:00 to 06:00 each day during the period of electronic device attachment, to refrain from going out of

1. A person who is attached with an electronic device that violates the duty to maintain the utility of the electronic device subject to attachment shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility;

A. On June 16, 2013, from around 04:46 to 05:15, the Defendant was notified of the status of low-power of the portable tracking device from the probation officer to the mobile phone from the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sp

B. On December 27, 2013, from around 20:30 to 21:16, the Defendant received notification from the probation officer of the status of low-power of the portable tracking device from the cell phone in Jinju-si, and received instructions from the probation officer, but refused to charge “Chewing only” and thereby harming the utility of the electronic device.

C. On April 3, 2014, around 05:56, the Defendant did not charge a location tracking device on a cell phone in order to prevent the Defendant from being informed of the location tracking device status at the D’s house located in Jinju-si C, and did not charge the electronic device.

arrow