logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.24 2015가단29968
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Attached drawings among the real estate first floor listed in the attached list, shall be indicated in (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1);

Reasons

1. On August 30, 2014, the Plaintiff’s indication of the claim is ordered as of August 30, 2014 by the Plaintiff’s owner.

With respect to the real estate stated in the port (hereinafter “instant real estate”), a lease contract was concluded by setting the monthly rent of KRW 603,000 (including surtax and water tax) and the lease period from September 30, 2014 to September 30, 2016, and the said real estate was delivered to the Defendant. The Defendant notified the termination of the lease contract several times on May 14, 2015, including the content-certified mail as of March 14, 2015.

Therefore, since the instant lease contract was terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention to terminate the contract, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay unjust enrichment equivalent to the unpaid rent or rent until the delivery of the said real estate is completed.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow