logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.16 2019고단4013
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall lend a means of access while demanding, demanding or promising compensation in the use and management of the means of access.

On June 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) called “B, a borrower, is the B employee of the lending company; (b) may loan KRW 10 million at interest rate of 3%; (c) it is possible to create a trade name card and send a physical card as the loan is possible.”

In order to obtain a loan, at around 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant sent two copies of the Ctel card connected to the D Bank account in the name of the Defendant (Account Number: E) and the Bank Account (Account Number:F).

As a result, the Defendant promised to receive a future loan in return and lent the means of access to his name in return.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written complaint of G;

1. Transfer certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of account transactions and account transactions;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act unfavorable to the defendant: The lending of the means of access is highly likely to be used for various crimes, such as tax evasion, gambling, fraud, etc.; circumstances favorable to the defendant's lending of the card actually used for the crime of fraud: The defendant is against himself; there is no benefit acquired through the crime of this case; there is no benefit acquired by the crime of this case; and the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment as above.

arrow