(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고정671

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고정671

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around October 7, 2016, the summary of the facts charged charged: (a) on the ground that the Defendant did not lend money from the Victim F (F.52 years of age) to the E cafeteria located in Gyeyang-si, Yangsan-si, the Defendant: (b) carried the victim’s face that he was seated; (c) carried the victim’s head debt on the part of the other victim, and (d) carried the victim’s head debt on the part of the other victim; and (c) carried the victim’s head debt on the part of the other victim, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

A. Criminal facts in a criminal trial should be established based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to have a reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not reach the extent that the prosecutor’s convictions could not lead to such a conviction, there are circumstances, such as whether the defendant’s assertion or defense is contradictory or unreasonable, and there is suspicion of guilt, even if the prosecutor’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.

Even if the Defendant’s interest should be determined (see Supreme Court Decision 2017Do1549, May 30, 2017). B. For the following reasons, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor and adopted by the Court was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by breaking up the victim’s ship and breaking up the victim’s tight head, which was shaking up, and shaking up, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case.

It is difficult to see it.

1) The victim made a statement in accordance with the facts charged in the instant case to the effect that “the victim was seated at the E restaurant with G and was seated at the Gu seat, but the victim was found to have been seated after the Defendant became aware of the victim’s entrance and was seated in the chair, and was pushed down on the part of the victim’s ship going beyond the upper part of the bar,” and that “the victim was sleeped after going over the upper part of the victim’s entrance.”

2) However, on the day of the incident with the victim;

G shall be between the defendant and the victim in this Court.

참조판례

-대법원 2017. 5. 30. 선고 2017도1549 판결

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2018.03.23 2018노13

-대구지방법원 2016.07.22 2015노392

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.12.13 2016고단2389

-대전지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고정1156

-인천지방법원 2016.07.22 2016고단2803