1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is evidence submitted by the Defendants in addition to this court. The Defendants, as the lessee or possessor of each real estate of this case, have the right to attract each real estate of this case based on the necessary cost and the right to claim reimbursement of beneficial

(B) The Defendants’ assertion that each of the instant real estate was insufficient to accept the Defendants’ assertion that the Defendants had the right to attract each of the instant real estate based on the right to claim reimbursement of expenses against B as a mandatory agent under a delegation contract entered into with B, and that each of the instant real estate was not sufficient to accept. Except where the Defendants’ respective “G” of the April 21, 5, 16, and 7 pages 18 of the judgment of the first instance as “B” is the same as the Defendants’ corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. In conclusion, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants is justified, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed as they are without merit.