beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 7,881,672 as well as 5% per annum from September 17, 2014 to December 15, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 16, 2014, the Defendants: (a) around 21:00, at the “HE” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, sent a text of proxy driving.
B. On September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff, an agent driver, who was sent back and arrived at the above place, expressed his intent not to drive the Defendant as agent at around 00:21 on September 17, 2014 that the Defendants would not try to start the conversation, and that there was a dispute over the key of Defendant F’s vehicle to the Defendant B by returning it to the Defendant B.
C. around that time, Defendant C, and D, who had been in front of the above “H frequency” building, followed the shape of the building “I”, which the stringer, Defendant B, and F, with the name of the victim and the victim, and Defendant C was pushed the Plaintiff’s body by hand. Defendant D had the Plaintiff look at the Plaintiff’s bring and knee with the heading and knee. Defendant C had the body of the Plaintiff, and Defendant C had the bringed the body of the Plaintiff, and Defendant C continued the Plaintiff’s body with the heading and kneeing back. Defendant C had the bringed the Plaintiff’s body. Defendant D, by causing the Plaintiff, led the Plaintiff to the heading back of the instant “I” building, led the Plaintiff’s body by drinking, and led the Plaintiff’s body back to the Plaintiff’s body. Accordingly, the Plaintiff continued the Plaintiff’s body back to the floor.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
As a result, the plaintiff suffered damages, such as cage cages, which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2-1 through 4, Eul evidence 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The cause of the claim against the defendant B: The following facts, except for those added to the end of paragraph (b) of the basic facts:
Defendant B, even though the Plaintiff demanded that the Plaintiff return his name name to the person who transferred it to the party who was not the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was not the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was the party who was