The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding or misunderstanding of legal principles) that the defendant's refusal to serve in the military on the grounds of religious conscience as a witness of the court is not a justifiable ground under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

2. On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the grounds that the refusal of enlistment by the Defendant had justifiable grounds under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed to have been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

The judgment of the court below is justified in the determination of the court below, based on the following circumstances revealed in detail by the records: ① the defendant was a dual national holding a U.S. nationality, ② was studying the doctrine of female and female witnesses under the parent slovah's slovah's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's sl's s ss s sl's s sl's.

3. Since the appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.