The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the defendant's mistake, the receipt of a letter from the victim C, and the recovery of the damaged vehicle from the victim C, the defendant committed the crime of this case again despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime as the previous crime and did not recover damage to the victim F, and there are various other circumstances such as the motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, the situation before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., and the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court are considered, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.

(However, since it is apparent that "1. seizure protocol" has been omitted in the part of the main column of evidence among the reasoning of the judgment below, it shall be corrected to add it ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.