A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2020, at around 23:30, the Defendant took a knife (15cc in knife length) knife, which is a dangerous object on the nearby abscambling room on the ground that the victim took a bath, while drinking the knife with the victim B and drinking the knife at the knife-si, Incheon Spo-gun, 164, 166-h., and the victim knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene, deadly weapons photographs, emergency medical services logs, and diagnostic certificates;

1. Relevant Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., “the grounds for suspended sentence”)

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Six to five years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the determination of types] of violent crimes: Special injury, repeated crime [the category 1] special injury (including a serious effort to recover damage], or damage recovery to a considerable part [the scope of the recommended punishment and the recommended punishment], mitigation area, imprisonment for four months to one year [the scope of the recommended punishment revised according to the applicable sentencing guidelines] from six months to one year (the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended in the sentencing guidelines is set according to the applicable sentencing guidelines in law, because the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended in the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range).

3. Determination of sentence: It is disadvantageous to the fact that he/she has been sentenced to a fine three times for a year and six months of suspended sentence of eight months, for community service, or for a crime of the same kind of order to attend a lecture, and that he/she fails to completely overcome the problem due to violent inclinations, such as being detained as a crime of violence, even around October 2019.