1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 15, 2005, the Plaintiff is a general assembly of Defendant B religious organizations (hereinafter “Defendant’s general assembly”) by establishing and organizing an exploitation school in E in E-si, E around November 15, 2005.

) After joining an affiliated branch church, the church name of B religious organization D (hereinafter “instant church”) is referred to as the “instant church”).

A) Around July 14, 2008, the building of the instant church was registered to preserve ownership in the name of F, a foundation, and the Plaintiff resided in the second floor of the instant church since that time. (2) The Defendant General Assembly is a non-corporate body with the aim of maintaining religious order within the local assembly and within the branch church in order to spread the doctrine of Modem. (3) The Defendant General Assembly is a non-corporate body with the aim of maintaining the religious order within the local assembly belonging to the Defendant General Assembly, and Defendant B Religious Organization C local council (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Local Council”) shall settle various disputes between the branch church belonging to the Defendant Local Council, and set the qualification requirements for the trade parties, such as pastors, and it is a non-corporate body that directs and supervises the branch church.

B. (1) On July 21, 2015, the Plaintiff, including the submission of the Plaintiff’s letter of resignation, was divorced with wife G around July 21, 2015, and at the time, the head of the Defendant local council knew the fact and solicits the Plaintiff to resign. On January 13, 2016, the Plaintiff is deemed to be the resignation letter with the content of “this case’s resignation” by allowing the Defendant local council to resign pursuant to Article 45(1) of the Constitution due to personal circumstances (hereinafter “instant resignation”).

(2) On January 7, 2016, the head of the personnel affairs division of the defendant local council accepted the letter of resignation of this case on January 14, 2016, and the head of the defendant local council dispatched H on the same day to the head of the church of this case as the head of the church of this case. (2) On February 29, 2016, the plaintiff combined with the former G, and sent on March 7, 2016 to the head of the defendant local council a letter of content-certified mail to the effect that he withdraws his intention of resignation on the ground of the adjudication.

However, around March 18, 2016, the president of the defendant local council resigneds from the membership of the instant church at the defendant general meeting.