A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with S, is a person who operates a site (hereinafter “GT,” “GU”) that relays the overseas famous sports soil site (hereinafter “AU”), such as “AU” and “AV,” and AC is a person who attempts to operate the said site.

On April 22, 2015, C, an accomplice in the operation of the sports soil site of the Defendant, was investigated by the police at around 23:00 on the charge of the operation of the gambling site, and was anticipated to commit a serious punishment, and contacted the Defendant with the intent to escape. The Defendant contacted AC to “AC is driving away on the police, so C would have to prepare a place to conceal it.”

Accordingly, AC, in collusion with the Defendant, GV (the two fathers of the AC) and the parent-friendly ES, concealed the offender in a manner that, from April 23, 2015 to September 2015, prepared a letter at the seat of the ES located in Gohap-gun GW and stayed in C.

Nevertheless, when AC was prosecuted for committing a crime, such as concealment of the above criminal, and was tried to prosecute AC, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case on February 23, 2017, the Seoul Central District Court 2016 High Order 8356 AC, which was located in Seocho-gu Seoul Western District Court, 14:00 on February 23, 2017, and 200, and testified, such as the violation of the National Sports Promotion Act and concealment of the criminal.

“,” and “(C) need not have any witness contact with the Defendant.

I became aware of the prosecutor’s question “............”

No. 1011, however, called the N. S.W.

The answer to ".......... ② The witness must be aware of the prohibition of departure by C, and then there is no indication on where the defendant and C are to escape.

The prosecutor’s question “ did not have intended to flee with the Defendant.”

The author was talking with S.

3.C was prohibited from departing from the Republic of Korea.

How Haba?

That is why there is no call between the defendant and the defendant.

The prosecutor’s question of “ ............”