A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:54 on January 1, 2019, the Defendant sent to the employees of the said establishment, who was the reporter in the front place of the Guri-si B, who had been reported on 112, that “if there is a guest smoking in tobacco,” and asked the Defendant to have the Defendant smoked, the Defendant expressed that “I am going to the fore, if I am to the fore, you will see whether I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore, I am to the fore.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV image closure);

1. The punishment identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances under the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime and other conditions of sentencing recorded in the records, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime;

Unfavorable circumstances: The first offender is the first offender, such as refusing to summon several times from the investigation stage, and the situation after the crime is not good.