Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2016, the Defendants: (a) in Jin-si, Defendant A opened a massage place in the name of “D” in the name of “A; (b) Defendant B, while comprehensively managing business establishments, such as the interview of employees, employment of carcs, and management of carcers, received KRW 180,000 from unspecified male customers who find the place and paid KRW 180,000 to sexual traffic women, and had sexual intercourse with sexual traffic women; (c) E, F, in the carcter, provided the visitors to the guest room, and (d) recruited to operate a sexual traffic business establishment by having them have sexual intercourse with unspecified male customers.

The Defendants, from December 19, 2016 to November 29, 2017, operated the said “D” according to the said public offering, received KRW 180,00 from the unspecified male customers who find out the said place, and had the said male customers sexual intercourse with the sexual intercourse.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against G, H, E, or F;

1. Details of each financial transaction, copies of bankbooks, contracts for lease of real estate, and investigation reports;

1. Application of the present Acts and subordinate statutes of evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 3;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Articles 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (the defense counsel of

However, considering the name of the head of the business, the name of the head of the head of the management Tong and the name of the head of the main fund management Tong are Defendant A, the defendants share the profits together with the defendants, the employees are the president of Defendant A (the president), the status, role in the business, and the relationship with investment and profits, etc., it is reasonable to view Defendant A as an accomplice who is not an aiding and abetting criminal. Therefore, the above argument is difficult to accept)

1. Defendants of the suspended sentence: Criminal Act.