logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.25 2015고정4232
폭행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on May 29, 2015, at the D main points located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, talked about the problem that the Defendant and the victim’s walked with their body; (b) had the victim’s face; and (c) committed assault, such as taking a bat and sphering the victim’s bat.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant consistently met with E’s face from investigative agency to this court, and only denied the aforementioned charges, with no trace of the E’s flapsing.

B. The evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged was E and at the site.

There are statements in F and G (Name B before the opening of name: H) investigative agencies and in this court, and E’s injury diagnosis report.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, each of the above statements is difficult to believe as it is, and the injury diagnosis report alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged of this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) Once the occurrence of the instant case occurred, E is a suspect, and the Defendant was investigated in each investigative agency as a victim status.

E at the time when the defendant's body was faced by the defendant and the body in the investigative agency, and the defendant was pushed the defendant, and the time was finished without the defendant, and the defendant was made at the time of his hand, etc., and made a statement that he was teared with the entrance wall, and the defendant was denied only the charge of his bodily injury, but did not make a statement from the defendant that he was bombing.

② If the Defendant and the Defendant did not intend to reach an agreement, E submitted a written diagnosis of his injury to an investigative agency. The Defendant was investigated as the status of the victim on July 7, 2015 when more than one month has elapsed since the date of the occurrence of the case.

(3) E was flabed by the Defendant and the Defendant in this court, and the Defendant was pushed down.

arrow