beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. Around August 2011, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to F at the law firm E office located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul.
The complaint shall be "F on February 16, 201," and the same year.
3. 11.1.1. The same year;
4. Around 20.20. G office run by F: (a) from G office operated by H to I operated by H with the trade name of H, G was authorized to produce and sell the recipient; (b) even though the authority was not granted to transfer the said authority to a third party, it was false to the complainant that “The complainant may obtain a large profit if he/she carries out the business of selling the recipient by acquiring the said authority by transfer of the G; and (c) to the complainant that he/she obtained the right to sell the recipient at five stores; and (d) subsequently, he/she concluded a contract to grant the complainant the right to sell the recipient at 147,000,000 won from the complainant in the name of the transfer price of the store.”
However, the fact is that F is the Defendant’s right to produce and sell the J recipient in the H Operation I granted from H by the G of F management (hereinafter “business right”).
B) Prior to the conclusion of the contract to transfer “A”, the Defendant intended to transfer the right to use the wall to the Defendant by changing the 4 points (the wall point) into the franchise store and transferring the right to use the wall points to the Defendant. However, as the person in charge of the work of Meded H changed from K to L, L proposed that “two stores to be established in the future for transfer transfer transfer is directly managed, and the 6 points to the franchise store are defective.” Thus, even though the Defendant notified the Defendant of the purport and delayed the transfer of the right to use the facility and notified the fact that the transfer of the right can be terminated if he transfers the facility right without the consent of H, the Defendant would request the transfer of the facility business right to be directly operated by G to the H, and the Defendant transferred the Defendant a total of five stores, such as the wall point (4 points), etc. for each of the above stores.