logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2020.01.09 2018가단5865
청구이의의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s order based on the payment order issued on May 4, 2018 at the Daegu District Court Branch Branch of the Plaintiff on May 4, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 23, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the Defendant on December 23, 2016, a neighborhood living facility and multi-household construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”).

(i) 715.8 million won (excluding value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) for the cost of construction;

(2) On January 14, 2017, the Plaintiff added the elevator installation work (30 million won) and the removal of the warehouse and the new construction of the warehouse (68 million won) to the instant construction after consultation with the Defendant on design change, and changed the construction cost to a total of KRW 752.6 million by increasing the respective amount.

B. As a result of the discontinuance and appraisal of the instant construction work, the current status of the period of the construction work that the Defendant suspended on or around September 2017 is as follows. The construction cost spent on or around September 2017: KRW 39,6310,00 = 3990,000 won (as a result of appraisal) = 391,090,000 won (in fact, the amount calculated by adding 10% to the sum of the installation cost of Brroho Lake Excellent pipes and the installation cost of machinery and tools installed at the time of inquiry and the general management enterprise profit) to KRW 5,20,000 (the amount calculated by adding 10% to the sum of the installation cost of Brhohoho Lake Excellents and machinery installed at the time of the end of September 2017). However, the Defendant’s assertion that the instant construction work was suspended at the time of the request for payment order = 400,000,000 won is also contrary to its purport.

arrow