logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.10 2018고단880
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant D, and E by each fine of KRW 5 million.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. In using and managing the access medium, no person who accused A shall transfer the access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts;

On June 2015, the Defendant received a proposal from a person in a name-free place introduced through Daegu or lower-gu F, to the effect that “The head of a Tong needs to be opened in four names because of a tax problem in operating shopping mall, and if so, the head of a Tong will be allowed to give off the amount of the amount of the money.” In an officetel where the name near the four streets prior to the death of Daegu-gu, the Defendant notified the name-free person of the passbook, the OTP producer, the physical card, and the password connected to the company bank account (Account Number G) in which the name cannot be known.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media.

2. In using and managing the access medium, Defendant B shall not transfer the access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.

On May 2014, the Defendant received a proposal from H, a branch of a building in Daegu or lower place, and consented to the proposal to open a passbook in the name of the head of the Tong in the name of the Defendant at the same place as a national bank instead of Daegu Jung-gu, and notified H of the passbook, an OTP-making machine, a physical card, and the password.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media.

3. In using and managing the access medium, no person who accused C shall transfer the access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.

On May 12, 2014, the Defendant opened a passbook in four names because it is necessary for the head of the Tong to issue a tax due to the local tax problem.

arrow