The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is the representative of C in macro-si B and is a full-time worker who runs a vessel processing business using 50 full-time workers.

The Defendant, from January 10, 201 to April 4, 2014, worked as piping lines from the above company and then retired from office, did not pay 43,45,155 won in total, as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, within 14 days from the date of retirement, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of payment period.

Judgment

and Conclusion

(a) Applicable law: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers, and Article 9 of the same Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers.

(c) Submission of a written withdrawal of each employee’s complaint (as of April 14, 2016: E, the person as of April 15, 2016: F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, April 18, 2016: D, M, and N on April 25, 2016)

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;