(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.09.16 2015고단406

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.09.16 2015고단406

절도미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 406]

1. Attempted larceny;

A. On February 15, 2015, at around 14:05, the Defendant discovered that, at the red medical source parking lot of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, 224, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the front window behind the Category C owner is opened; (b) opened a hand, opened a corrective device with a percentage of the corrective device; and (c) attempted to take 52,00 won in cash from the victim E-owned land on which he was placed on the front line; and (d) failed to carry the wind that he was discovered to C; and (e) attempted to take place on the part of the victim E, who was placed on the front line.

B. On March 25, 2015, at around 15:00, the Defendant opened a top door of the passenger car owned by the victim F, which is not corrected at the Red Medical Center parking lot of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, 224, and opened the top door of the passenger car owned by the victim F, which is located at the rear seat of the lower seat, and obstructed the victim’s possession of objects to open and steals, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime, but did not lead to the Defendant’s wind, which is perceived by the victim.

[2015 Highest 637]

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Hchip car.

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on March 11:15, 2015, and driven it to drive a 30km road from the west side to the west side at the speed of about 50km from the west side.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service should thoroughly operate the entire city and safely in compliance with the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front wheels and the front pent part of the freight Ⅱ, which the victim I (year 72) drive on the opposite lane due to the negligence of driving the center line.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of business so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 4,709,461 can be borne by the Defendant.

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.07.24 2015고단352

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2014.08.26 2014고단64

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.11.13 2015고단904

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.04.10 2017고단902

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.03.25 2015고단29