The appeal by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of money (e.g., cost of sales promotion, return of sales commission, compensation for damages caused by illegal acts) and delivery in the principal lawsuit, and the defendant filed a claim for the payment of money (e.g. sales agency fee and execution agency fee) as a counterclaim.

The first instance court dismissed all the claims of the principal lawsuit, accepted some of the counterclaim claims, and dismissed the remainder.

The Plaintiff appealed on the monetary payment of the principal claim and the cited part of the counterclaim claim.

Therefore, the scope of this court's appeal is limited to the plaintiff's appeal.

2. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence adopted in the court of first instance shows additional evidence submitted by this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of judgment as to the plaintiff's additional assertion, such as Paragraph 3, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

approximately 99% “A” under section 6 of the judgment of the first instance is raised to “96%”.

The Defendant “B” of the first instance judgment No. 9 is the Plaintiff, and the Defendant “B” is the Plaintiff, pursuant to Article 11(1) of the instant parcelling-out agency contract.

In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment from 10th to 3th, “Insufficient,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, “Insufficient,” is difficult.

Part 10 to 19 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted.

On the 13th anniversary of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

【3) The Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to pay KRW 150,000,000, which is 20% of the remainder of the enforcement agency fee of KRW 750,000,000, to the “within one month after the Plaintiff’s closing general meeting of accounts.” The Plaintiff’s closing general meeting of accounts has yet to be held.