beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 3715] On April 29, 2013, the Defendant called the victim C’s Handphones from the unclaimed land to use the Internet-based Handphones, and saying, “If an employee of the company, while engaged in the domestic clothing manufacturing business, embezzled public funds and lends 10 million won as the garment manufacturing fund is insufficient, he/she would repay by June 25, 2013.”
However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to repay the above debt by 200,000 won due to the Defendant’s failure to pay the credit card debt amounting to 3 million won, and became the bad credit holder in 2004, and was unable to repay the above debt until the above date and time. As such, the Defendant did not operate the clothing manufacturing company, the employees of the company did not have embezzled public funds and did not want to consume the money borrowed to the victim for their daily living expenses, and therefore, there was
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Nong Bank (E) account in the name of D designated by the Defendant as the borrowed money, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.
[2013 Highest 5020] On November 22, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and was released on August 14, 2009 and passed on January 21, 2010.
The Defendant used the temporary name of “F” as the only object of committing a crime against female victims, and was a business that operates a mutual clothes company of “G” which manufactures clothing in a foreign country with a factory in the OEM method, and was planned to acquire large amounts of money from victims for business funds after the childbirth.
1. Around April 14, 2010, the Defendant at the victim H’s house located in 1402 Dong Dong-dong 205 Dong Dong-dong 1402, the Defendant said that “the Defendant would use and repay only 2-3 months if he/she lends 30 million won to the Defendant.”
However, the facts are.