Defendants shall be punished by fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2018, the Defendants: (a) within the victim F-si in front of the “E hotel” located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; and (b) the victim “this si is Incheon si, so it is impossible to operate cheon-si.”

Defendant A, upon the request of the lower vehicle while stating “A,” and Defendant A, “I am from the back of the back of the back.”

L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

I wish to see at a large rate, "I am am............, Defendant B shall write on one stop, but I am...

C Doz Doz Doz Doz. Doz Doz.

Along to about 30 minutes of the victim's failure to comply with the victim's demand for discharge of his/her taxi while taking a large bath, the customer waiting to board the victim's taxi was prevented from using the victim's taxi.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's taxi operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 310 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine for the crime, Article 314 of the same Act, and the selection of a fine for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. In light of the records of the Defendants’ previous crimes, the attitude and degree of the instant crime, etc., of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendants’ interference with the victim’s business cannot be deemed to be negligible.

However, the Defendants are against the Defendants and agreed with the victims (see the self-agreement on September 17, 2018), and the motive and circumstances of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the public trial, such as the Defendants’ age, sex, family relationship, economic situation, etc., shall be comprehensively considered and determined as ordered.