logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고단945
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who, at around 2009, took charge of the operation of a game room and, at around 2013, was accused of having been subject to criminal punishment due to a crackdownd incident that interfered with the duties at the restaurant, etc., reported falsely or unilaterally expressed a telephone call over about 67 occasions from January 2015 to March 2015, the Daejeon Preferred Police Station D, located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu, and led to an act that leads to a failure by finding the said district unit from time to time.

On February 15, 2015, at around 01:35, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the circumstances in which the said district was found as the said district and worked in the said district E; (b) took note that “A fine of KRW 2,50,000 is paid; (c) E” was used as a force to use the said E, etc., by putting the head several times on the civil petitioner’s books adjacent to the marith; and (d) putting the rash for posting a day-to-day sign on the math’s books, and continuously putting the rash for posting a day-to-day sign on the math’s books, by putting the computers on his hand and taking the head on the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning investigation and maintenance of order of police officers.

B. On February 27, 2015, at around 23:47, the Defendant, who was found in the said D zone and was working in the said D zone, threatened the F, “Chospia, I will not take place.” On the other hand, the Defendant continued to drop off the string to the said F, and use the type of walking the string of the civil petitioner’s book several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning investigation and maintenance of order of police officers.

C. At around 22:00 on March 8, 2015, the Defendant continued to drink the civil petitioner’s book by stating that “B’s Dongin is an official of the Prosecutor’s Office, i.e., a public prosecutor of the public prosecutor’s office, i.e., she will not keep this Chewing.”

arrow