1. On September 23, 2016, there is an accident between C vehicles and Dalbane, which occurred from the flow distance of Cheongdoro-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City around 11:30.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 23, 2016, the Plaintiff driven a C-Motor vehicle owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on September 11:30, 2016, and proceeding from the apartment room of the Nam-gu Incheon East-gu Navy 7 apartment complex to the coastal road. On September 23, 2016, the Plaintiff returned to the said apartment bank again from the one-lane to the two-lane.

B. The Defendant driven the same time DNA Oralba (hereinafter “Defendant Oralba”) and proceeded into the south East-westing area from the jurisdiction of the Boposposposposposposposponding area. On the above Cheongposposponding distance, the Defendant moved to the 7rdsposponding area of the above Posposposponding apartment complex and entered the top right way.

C. At this time, the Defendant displayed the scene and circumstances of the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) simply on the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which is close to one’s own on the part of the Defendant, with a bucking and plucking the hand on the right side.

•1 The defendant Oba, Meba, Ma2 are the plaintiff vehicle.

On the flow of traffic, when the front signal of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (which is capable of the front line or the walking signal) is the left turn signal, the front signal of the direction prior to the moving of Defendant Otoba shall be red.

The defendant demanded the plaintiff to accept the insurance in relation to the accident of this case, but the plaintiff refused to accept it, and the plaintiff claimed a direct payment of the insurance money to Dong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. which is the insurer of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entries or videos of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred only by the Defendant’s negligence, and there was no negligence on the part of the Plaintiff.

B. The defendant's assertion that the plaintiff neglected his duty of care to prevent the accident even though he had been able to have exercised his duty of care by properly examining whether the vehicle was bypass at the time of the internship. Thus, the plaintiff is also liable for the accident

3...