logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.25 2017고단3929
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On June 2016, the Defendant, under the pretext of the purchase price for the fixed landing point C, did not bring a high value to C by failing to bring the victim C at a place of influence, “influence to bring the fluence to bring the fluence to the fluence and the fluence of the fluence to the fluence influ

The payment shall be made with the profits from the operation of the fixed-value store on the loan of the fixed-value.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact is that the defendant only worked as an employee at the fixed land point operated by the branch at the time, but did not operate the fixed land point as the same business, and even if the victim borrowed money, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the personal debt, so he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

Nevertheless, on June 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 3 million from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (E) around June 14, 2016 as the borrowed money from the victim; and (c) received KRW 6.6 million in total on three occasions from July 8, 2016 from that time to July 8, 2016 as the borrowed money as stated in the attached crime list.

2) On July 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, in the name of the Internet business fund, was a police officer, to start the Internet business at home, and to lend money to the victim on a one-day basis because 500,000 won per day may be reduced.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that it was used for personal purposes such as illegal sports discussions, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt to the victim through the Internet business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 1 million from the injured party by deceiving the injured party as above and received money as a loan from the injured party on July 15, 2016, and subsequently acquired KRW 20 million through a total of eight times from that time to September 7, 2016 as stated in the list of crimes in the annexed crime.

(b) fraud with respect to victim F;

arrow