The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving service of BK5 taxis.

On December 18:15, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi and proceeded along the two-lanes of the 155 U.S. Jinsan International Road (hereinafter referred to as the “instant intersection”) from the Hinsan International Road toward the Hinsan International Road, Jung-gu, Incheon.

Since a signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well the right and the right and the right, and to safely drive the signal in accordance with the signals of the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the two-lanes of the victim D(64 years old) drive E-Poter 2, which proceeded to turn to the left from two-lanes of the vehicle due to the negligence that led to the left turn, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is the left turn turn turn turn, and received the front part of the two-lanes on the right side of the vehicle in question.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to both sides of knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-k

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the prosecutor bears the burden of proving the facts constituting the crime prosecuted, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Do5662 delivered on December 24, 2002, etc.). B.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, K5 taxi vehicles (hereinafter “instant taxi”) and D operated by the defendant at the time and place specified in the instant facts charged.