beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around August 5, 2016, the Defendant of the 2017 Highest 6238, the Defendant, “Around August 5, 2016, the victim D directors located in Kimhae-si, may supply the victim with the “AE office with the victim D directors located in Kimhae-si,” with the removal of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000.
Money was falsely stated to the effect that it would be repaid by August 31, 2016.
However, while the Defendant participated in the removal work related to the F redevelopment construction project at the time, but the relocation work was not conducted smoothly, the Defendant already received and disposed of the victim’s visa, etc. with advance payment, and the boiler sold the boiler to an enterprise called “G”, etc. In such a situation, it was difficult to make profits from the business, and there was no ability or intent to make profits from the business by the agreed deadline due to the absence of any particular property, and there was no intent to use it as the cost related to the removal work at the F&A with the victim
Accordingly, it received 50,000,000 won from the damaged person to the Saemaeul Treasury in the name of the defendant on the same day.
The defendant of "2017 Highest 7644" is an employer who runs a construction business by employing two full-time workers at H of the wife population in Young-si.
The Defendant worked at the place of removal in Seoul Special Metropolitan City from February 28, 2016 to March 31, 2017, and did not pay a total of KRW 16,100,000 of the J’s wages within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline.
"2017 Highest 8441"
1. On May 1, 2017, the Defendant, at around 10:00, sold scrap metal generated from the removal work to the victim L before the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City K, a contractor who entered into a contract for the removal work with M, and the victim.
In other words, this paper concludes a building sales contract with the victim.
However, the defendant does not have entered into a contract for removal works with M and even if he receives money from the injured party, expenses, etc.