logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2013.12.12 2013고단494
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 8, 2007, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court, and on November 30, 2009, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act by receiving a summary order of 1.5 million won by the same court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at least twice.

Criminal facts

1. Around 13:50 on August 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a B EX car while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.157% at a section of approximately one kilometer from the road to the access road to the fluent village located in the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the new fluence of the new fluence of the new fluence of the new fluence of the new g

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. Around 13:50 on August 9, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) operated the above X-ray car, leading to the first line of the road prior to the access road to the above YE, to the right-side gate from the right-side gate.

There is a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent the shock with the vehicle running on the road in front of the operation direction by the victim C(55 years old) as the vehicle in front of the operation direction of the defendant as the vehicle in front of the road in which the width of the farm near the farm is narrow.

Nevertheless, as in Paragraph 1, the Defendant’s negligence that was unable to conduct an electric ebbbbrence while under the influence of alcohol, caused the injury of the victim E (V, 53 years of age) by the ebratum of the ebratum ray, tension, etc. of the ebratum that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim C by shocking the ebrat of the said ebrat-car behind the said ebrat-car, and caused the injury of the victim E (V, 53 years of age), which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the said ebrat.

arrow