1. On July 24, 2015, Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2015 Gohap1008, and 100610 (Counterclaim) against the Defendant’s Plaintiff.

(b) the facts of the basis;

A. 1) The parties to the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: C (hereinafter “C”)

A) On January 14, 201, 201, Aju Industry Co., Ltd., Ltd., the land D (hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”) in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul.

On January 14, 2011, Aju Industry Co., Ltd. completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant tin acid. Thereafter, C entered into a contract for the business of producing aggregate in the instant tin acid and a sales contract for the purchase of aggregate produced between Aju Industry Co., Ltd. and Aju Industry Co., Ltd. on January 1, 2012. 3. Terms and conditions of the Agreement 2: from March 11, 2012 to March 11, 2017.

3) Each of the roles and burdens are as follows. (B) The Defendant is supplied with raw stone (franchising materials) and land rents from the instant tin acid with the Defendant’s vehicle on the following terms: (3),500 won per 1 cubic meter = 3,500 won per 1 cubic meter in this case’s land rent for the instant tin plant * The Defendant pays 20,000 won per year to the Plaintiff; (c) the Defendant’s construction cost for the instant sand plant, which is the Defendant’s production facility, is borne by the Defendant; but (d) the Plaintiff bears the installation cost of the Defendant’s input when the issue arises within one year due to the Plaintiff’s fault, such as the discontinuance of contract, termination of contract, or the shortage or suspension of raw stone supply. (d) The Defendant determines that the instant sand plant facility installed by the Defendant is purchased and installed for the said site on the condition that the Plaintiff purchased and installed for the instant tin plant on the basis of reasons attributable to the Plaintiff’s operator on the ground of cancellation, permission, etc.