logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.08.22 2017나23593
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff as to defendant B Corporation, among the judgment of the court of first instance, equivalent to the amount of additional payment order below.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff has treated all of the food and wastewater (food and wastewater generated in the process of stuffing food and waste and food and waste generated after stuffing food and waste) generated in a region A by means of marine dumping, including the process of implementing a public disposal facility for treating the Plaintiff’s wastewater. As the marine dumping of food and waste was completely prohibited from January 1, 2013, a public disposal facility for treating food and waste water (hereinafter “instant facility”).

2) The business that establishes the business (hereinafter referred to as the “instant business”)

(2) In the process of promoting the instant project, the Plaintiff planned to link, combine, and treat the water and the drinking water generated from the process of treating the water through the process of treating the water through the process of treating the water through the process of treating the water in the daily waste landfill located in D, and compared and reviewed around January 201, the method of treating the drinking water without installing a pre-treatment facility (energy treatment method) separate from the method of treating the drinking water by installing a pre-treatment facility, such as the suspected fire extinguishing, and without installing a pre-treatment facility.

3. The Plaintiff, after the first treatment of 120 tons of the drinking water, expected to treat 120 tons of the drinking water as an average of 120 tons of the drinking water and 200 tons of the drinking water per day by combining it with the treatment after treatment, and filed an application with the National Treasury for subsidies of KRW 2.31 billion of the total budget around April 19, 201, which is 30% of the total budget.

B. In order to facilitate the instant project, the Plaintiff entered into the instant consignment agreement between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, determined to entrust Defendant B, a specialized company, with the management of the basic design of the instant facilities, construction supervision and supervision, and other incidental business for the smooth implementation of the instant project. Defendant B and the public disposal facility for food wastes at the time of July 6, 201.

arrow