A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery in the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court’s House on February 1, 2012, and completed the execution of the said sentence in the Daejeon Prison on August 23, 2015.

[2] On May 18, 2016, around 21:15, at the Gyeonggi-si Police Station D Public Security Center of Gyeonggi-si, which is located in Pyeongtaek-si, the Defendant demanded the police officer E, who works in the above district, to submit a fine to resolve the Defendant’s default problem, to “I are subject to a fine.” On the ground that there is no record of the present number of times from the above police officer, the Defendant was urged to return home, and on the ground that he was able to do so, he she saw the “non-market on the market price” of the civil petition room, which was installed on the outer wall of the above Public Security Center.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Deficial photographs of civil petitions destroyed;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, personal identification and acceptance status Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [Scope of Recommendation] Where the value of the article that has been invalidated or destroyed is insignificant (i.e., one month or eight months) in the mitigation area (i., one month or eight months), (i.e., a person subject to special mitigation] (i., a judgment of sentence] a large number of punishment records due to violence, obstruction of performance of official duties, damage to public goods, robbery, etc.; (ii) the crime of this case was committed during the repeated offense period; (iii) the crime of intentionally destroying the damaged article into the police police police forces under the influence of alcohol and intentionally destroying it; and (iv) the economic value of the damaged article is insignificant.