logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.24 2015고정1034
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 2, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.088% of blood alcohol concentration at around 23:49, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately KRW 100 meters for C in front of the road in front of the head of the Japanese market located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, where the trade name of the head of the Japanese market located in the Nam-gu, Incheon, and the front of the road in front of the Hebane, as the former part, at approximately 666 meters.

2. On January 3, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 00:47% of blood alcohol concentration, and was driving at approximately 100 meters of the volume of C in front of the road in front of the 100-meter Party of the Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon, with the wheels of the alleyway in front of the 666-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drunk driving (investigative Records, No. 16, No. 27), each alcohol appraisal statement (investigative Records, No. 14, No. 26), and each alcohol driver's report on detection (investigative Records, No. 40, No. 41);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of punishment for the crimes, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) shall be decided as per the Disposition, comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances revealed in the pleadings, including the fact that the defendant committed the crime in this case despite the previous conviction.

arrow