1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that conducts defect diagnosis and safety diagnosis of multi-family housing, and the Defendant is the council of occupants' representatives comprised of sectional owners of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Building (hereinafter "the instant multi-family building").

The defective diagnosis of a building through a field survey (1) on 90 days after the commencement of the separate service period of value-added tax of KRW 3,450,000 on the supply of a separate intermediate payment of value-added tax of KRW 11,50,000 within 10 days from the commencement of the field of the separate payment of value-added tax of KRW 5,750,00,000 after the commencement of the interim payment of value-added tax, 3,450,000 after the commencement of the separate service period of value-added tax of KRW 3,450,00 after the completion of the interim payment of value-added tax, - the defect diagnosis of a building through a field survey on the ground of the underground parking lot, outer wall, outer wall, stairs, main entrance, roof, roof floor, roof floor, outdoor auxiliary facilities (2) - The defect diagnosis of a building through a field survey on the condition of the building by at least 20% after the completion of the investigation on the condition (3).

(5) Submission of a defective diagnosis report after the defective diagnosis of a building through an on-site investigation;

B. On March 5, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for defect diagnosis services with the Defendant’s Chairperson and the Plaintiff’s duty to diagnose the defects that occurred in the instant aggregate building during the service period from March 8, 2018 to June 5, 2018, that the Defendant shall pay KRW 11,500,000 (excluding value-added tax) as service cost when performing the duty to diagnose the defects that occurred in the instant aggregate building.

(hereinafter “instant service contract”). The main contents of the instant service contract are as follows.

C. On March 20, 2018, the Plaintiff received KRW 2,300,000 from the Defendant.

After investigating the defects in the instant condominium building in accordance with the instant service agreement, the Plaintiff prepared and submitted a defect diagnosis report to the Defendant on May 14, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.