The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the child of the victim D (V, 91).

A. On February 10, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around 10, 2009, after hearing the sound at which the victim’s home from the victim’s home from the Gangnam-gu apartmentx xx xx xx sees the sound at which the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife F are disputed; (b) interfered with the Defendant’s husband and wife’s fighting; and (c) caused the victim, who gets away from the stairs, and gets off the stairs being pushed down to F, by falling off the victim’s side, such as the victim, by cutting off the victim’s room from the stairs to the first floor, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as the victim’s chest 12 in the number of days of treatment.

B. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant, at the first floor of the same place as Paragraph (a) of this Article, brought an injury to the victim, such as a batur, Inc., closed, left, etc. (Fratur, Inc., closed, left) on the left-hand left-off type of the number of days of treatment, by making it difficult for the victim to take account of his or her demand that he or she would not take into account the demand of the Defendant, and by hand several times the body of the victim.

(c)

On November 24, 2014, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay money within the victim room of the same place as Paragraph A, but was refused from the victim, the Defendant led the victim's arms to the ward by hand, led the victim to the ward, led the victim to use his arms toward the ward, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the mouth of the bones of the bones of the number of days for treatment.

As a result, the defendant suffered three bodily injury on the victim who is lineal ascendant.

2. Determination

A. Determination 1 on the admissibility of the evidence common to the evidence 1) G on the confirmation of fact (13 times a year), D’s authenticity (40 times a year), and D’s agent’s written opinion (51 times a year) written by G is inadmissible on the grounds that the Defendant did not agree to use as evidence, and that the authenticity of its establishment was not proven by the testimony of the originator, and thus, it is not admissible.

2) Each police statement protocol of D (net 14, 15, 36) and police statement protocol of G (net 16) regarding D also did not agree to be admitted as evidence by the defendant, and the statement of the original party.