logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.09 2014나38045
유류분반환청구
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Text of the judgment of the court of first instance;

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 8 to No. 49 of the judgment of the court of first instance). Thus, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part concerning the calculation of the shortage of legal reserve of the plaintiffs are as follows. This part of "this court" in the third part of the judgment of the court of the court of the first instance shall be decided as "Uwon District Court". The part concerning the third part of the judgment of the court of the first instance from 6th to 8th part of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be decided as follows. The corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance (Articles 10 to 9th 14 of the judgment of the court of the first instance) is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance (Articles

(2) The Defendant’s assertion and its determination (A) received the above KRW 1,700,00,000 from the network D on condition that G shall be paid KRW 100,000,00, and the Defendant’s wife’s payment of KRW 60,000 to G’s bank account through N’s bank account, etc., and the Defendant’s payment of KRW 1,70,000,000 to KRW 10,000,00 as well as KRW 100,000,00 as well as KRW 1,70,000,000 to the Defendant’s living property from the network, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s payment of KRW 1,00,00,000 as to the above KRW 1,70,00,000,000 as well as KRW 100,000,00 as well as KRW 100,00 for each of the above reasons.

The non-party T.

arrow