A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant pays consolation money of five million won to the applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who attempted to commit an offense from around February 8, 2018 to the same year.

3. Until February 2, 300, the victim D, who had ever attended the past course at the accommodation accommodation, etc. located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, through social network service, sent obscene pictures and videos that are edited to show as victims’ pictures and victims, and then sent them to the e-mail address designated in the virtual currency amounting to KRW 300 million without sending them to the e-mail address, the above pictures, videos, and videos, and E (name of bread operated by the victim) with the purport that “I spread malicious letters with the contents of the above pictures, videos, and E (name of bread house operated by the injured party)” and sent them to the victim D, who is the owner of the virtual currency address A, designated by the defendant, but the victim did not comply with this.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to have a third party receive property from another person, but he attempted to do so.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) posted a title “G” on March 3, 2018, for the purpose of slandering the victim, who did not send a virtual currency equivalent to KRW 300 million to the address designated by the victim D, as described in the preceding paragraph, regardless of the absence of contact or contact after being hedgingd with the victim in around 2012, the Defendant refused to disclose the victim’s identity to the Internet site and social relations network service (SNS), “G” by accessing the Internet site and social relations (SNS), “B” by visiting the open-type room, “the Defendant was aware of the victim’s identity and actual progress, and was given the victim’s identity and confidential money,” and the Defendant rejected the victim’s disclosure of the victim’s identity by asking it to the two children who were sexually off and opened to the public.

D. D.