logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.09.19 2019고단2395
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 4, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Changwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 1 million by the same court on January 11, 2010, respectively.

1. Around 10:25 on May 16, 2019, the Defendant driven a B Au Q5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.096% from a section of about 65 km to the roads located in the central road of Changwon-si, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, Seoul-do.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of the Road Traffic Act prohibition provisions.

2. No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. who has violated the Road Traffic Act shall threaten or endanger other persons, or cause any danger to traffic, by consecutively committing two or more acts, from among the acts of violating signal or directions, violating speed, maintaining a safe distance, violating the prohibition of speed change, violating the prohibition of rapid restraint, passing methods, or violating the prohibition of interference with passing, or by continuously or repeatedly committing one act;

On May 16, 2019, the Defendant driven Q5 car from 17.3km to 29.0km away from 17.0km to 29.0km away from 17.0km to 187km in speed exceeding 100km in speed. The Defendant, without securing safety distance, was driving the vehicle in close vicinity to the preceding vehicle without operating the direction, changed the vehicle vehicle, and operated two times in speed violations, such as changing the vehicle line using the side, five times in violation of overtaking method, two times in violation of prohibition of change of course, two times in violation of safety distance, and two times in securing safety distance, thereby threatening or endangering others or causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow