logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.13 2015고단911
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:40 on December 15, 2014, the Defendant, along with the victim E (year 42) and the victim F (year 42), had a drinking in the D cafeteria located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

1. Under the influence of alcohol at the above date, at the above time, the Defendant: (a) breathed the victim E with the victim’s body; (b) taken several times, followed the victim’s body; and (c) taken several facess of the victim’s left face by drinking, the Defendant diversed the victim about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury by a group, deadly weapon, etc.) was committed by the victim F at the above date, time, and at the above place, with beer disease, which is a dangerous object from the victim F on the ground that the victim F would not mislead the victim E, one time, and the victim f was unloaded from the victim's massage to the beer disease, which is a dangerous object, one time, and the victim facing the horse once again, and the victim faced face face, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of police statement to F and E;

1. Some of the G statements;

1. A medical certificate of injury (E, F);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report, the details of the approval of the taxi card, and the photograph of the taxi company [the defendant denies some crimes to the effect that he did not assault the victim F with a scopic disease. However, in light of the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court, the defendant can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant gets off the victim due to a scopic disease, a dangerous object, so the above argument by the defendant

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act shall be based on probation and community service order.

arrow