logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.07.22 2014가단42281
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, such as the conclusion of a sales contract with the Plaintiff, is a mutual aid contractor who entered into a mutual aid agreement with C to compensate for the damage in cases where C inflicts property damage on the parties to a transaction by intention or negligence in performing real estate brokerage services by determining the amount of deduction as KRW 100 million on October 26, 201, and the period of deduction as from October 27, 201 through October 26, 2012.

On December 7, 2011, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with C, a broker, to sell land and buildings (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) at KRW 958,00,000,000,000 for the purchase price, but the down payment of KRW 250,000,000,000 for the intermediate payment of KRW 22,50,000,000,000 for the intermediate payment of KRW 26,00,000 for December 26, 201 and to pay the balance of KRW 483,00,000 by February 25, 201 (hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”).

B. B, such as F and B’s loan for consumption, concluded a loan agreement with F to borrow KRW 20 million from F on December 7, 201, KRW 30 million from G, KRW 30 million from H, and KRW 170 million from H respectively.

Pursuant to a loan for consumption agreement, H 6.2 million won to a certified judicial scrivener on December 7, 2011, and 7,8560,000 won to the Plaintiff, and the same month to the Plaintiff.

8. B paid KRW 8,524,00 to B, and F performed a contract by paying KRW 28,534,089 to B on December 8, 2011, KRW 171,465,911 to I who is the Plaintiff’s husband, and KRW 30 million to B on the same day G on the same day.

C. On December 7, 201, the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff and F, entered into a mortgage agreement with F, etc. on the instant real estate, and agreed that “The mortgage agreement shall be automatically null and void if the contract is terminated.”

Pursuant to a mortgage agreement, on December 7, 2011, F et al. completed the registration of establishment of a mortgage (hereinafter “registration of establishment of a mortgage of this case”) with respect to the instant real estate by the debtor B and the mortgagee F et al. (F 340 million won, G 51 million won, and H 289 million won).

between the Plaintiff and F, etc.

arrow