beta
Text
1. The defendant completed the acquisition by possession on January 20, 1984 with respect to the forest land of 12,397 square meters in Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. According to the forest survey report prepared during the Japanese occupation occupation period, the Gyeonggi-do 12,397 square meters of forest land C in Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”) is registered as being subject to the Defendant’s attachment D.
B. The instant land was restored on December 9, 1963, and on January 20, 1964, Franchi (the president G; hereinafter “Franchi”) who had an address in E in the forest land register was restored to the owner, and thereafter, it is unregistered until now.
C. On December 31, 2009, the land of this case was declared missing on the grounds of the expiration of the period of disappearance on June 25, 1955 at the Government District Court Decision D (D and permanent domicile: Gyeonggicheon-gun H), D’s wife I, J, K, K, and L, which became final and conclusive around that time, and the defendant who is only alive.
On the other hand, the plaintiff and the F are organizations similar to clans which consist of those who reside in the Gyeonggicheon-gun area among the descendants, and the family clans A (the president G; hereinafter the "A clans") is composed of the 16-year-old descendants of M as the 16-year-old P, which is the 16-year-old descendants of M, and is a clans similar organization consisting of those who reside in the Gyeonggicheon-gun area among the descendants.
E. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against FJ and Republic of Korea by Seoul Central Court 2009Da31053 on the ground that he himself is the sole heir of the fleets whose three parcels including the instant land, and against FJ and Republic of Korea, seeking the confirmation of ownership of the instant land, and the implementation of each procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration of the remaining two parcels of land against other parties, including FJ and FJ, and the said court decided on December 9, 2010 on the premise that the Defendant was aware of three parcels of land including the instant land, and that the Defendant was solely inherited, it cannot be deemed that he was equipped with the substance of FJ, and dismissed the lawsuit against Korea.