The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Medical Service Act and the establishment of fraud.

The argument that the lower court erred in the misapprehension of the rules on the exclusion of illegally collected evidence is not a legitimate ground for appeal, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal, since the Defendant’s assertion that there was an error in violation of the rules on the exclusion of illegally collected evidence was raised only when the lower court made a final appeal on the grounds of appeal or did not make it subject to ex officio determination. It cannot be deemed that such a ground for

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.