logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.01.21 2015고정843
산지관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to temporarily use a mountainous district for the purpose of creating forest roads, work roads, forest products transportation roads, forest paths, such as mountain trails and forest trails, or other similar mountain paths shall report the mountainous district in the area of a state forest to the head of the forest office. However, on November 201, 2014, the Defendant opened a access road on a 336 square meters of a state forest located in B located in the Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, without reporting it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a survey report on actual conditions, relevant mountainous district, GPS survey result map (1/1,00), land register (fest), investigation report (verification of the purpose of damage to state forests, etc.), investigation report (verification of the purpose of damage to state forests, etc.), and investigation report (verification of the purpose of

1. According to Article 55 subparag. 2 of the pertinent Act and Article 15-2 subparag. 3 of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, the former part of Article 15-2 subparag. 2 of the Mountainous Districts Management Act, and Article 15-3 subparag. 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act and Article 18-3 subparag. 34-3 of the same Enforcement Decree of the same Act, in order to create a place for evacuation of the length of a mountain, even if it falls under a place for evacuation, it can be seen that a report must be made upon

(Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that interest and desire in the reasoning forestry for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have been committed prior to the crime, and that the failure to observe the legal procedure cannot be justified, due to the fact that the person with a disability of class 4 is the person with a disability of class 4 and there are no criminal records of the same kind, etc.

arrow