Text
1. The defendant points out each of the main floors of the building listed in the attached list in the attached list in the attached Form No. 1, B, D, C, and A.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 31, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the leased deposit amount of KRW 15,000,000,000 and the lease period from July 31, 2014 to July 30, 2016, the part on the ship (hereinafter “instant real estate”) which successively connects each point of the land in the attached Form No. 1, B, D, C, and A among the land floors of the building listed in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as indicated in the attached Table No. 15, 2016.
B. On August 29, 2014, the Plaintiff sent a certificate to the Defendant, stating that “The Defendant had the risk of fire by turning candlelights into the room, and the Defendant kids, caused malodor due to pet animals, and other tenants make a port. As the instant lease contract is terminated, the Plaintiff sent a certificate to the effect that “the Plaintiff is entitled to receive KRW 15,00,000,000, and deliver the instant real estate.”
C. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking damages (defensive materials) for unlawful acts, such as intrusion on the Plaintiff’s real estate without permission, gas cutting off, unauthorized removal from the Plaintiff, abandonment of the Plaintiff’s land, etc., Seoul Western District Court Decision 2014Gaso63268, which claimed damages (defensive materials) 5,00,000 won
(2) In addition to the payment of damages as above, the Defendant changed the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim to the effect that the lease contract of this case is terminated and the deposit is returned to KRW 15,00,000 on the basis of the Plaintiff’s nonperformance. As seen above, the claim and the cause of the claim containing the declaration of intent to terminate the lease contract of this case were sent to the Plaintiff on March 9, 2015.
On June 10, 2015, the judgment was rendered on June 10, 2015 to the effect that “the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 15,000,000 to the Defendant simultaneously with the delivery of the instant real estate from the Defendant.”
Although the defendant appealed against this, the above judgment became final and conclusive as it was all dismissed in the appellate court (Seoul Western District Court 2015Na3505) and the final appeal (Supreme Court 2016Da5658).
E. The Plaintiff rendered a judgment prior to the instant lawsuit.