logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단3294
특수재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On September 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on September 30, 2013, and on March 19, 2015, the Defendant is one year and eight months, and the same criminal records are more than nine times, in addition to the completion of the execution

The Defendant is an employee of the “D” in Daejeon E-gu, and the victim E is the representative of the said company.

1. On August 21, 2015, the Defendant causing special damage: (a) at the office of the above company around 20:00 on August 21, 2015, the Defendant called the victim for the reason that he did not receive telephone from the victim because it was not good between the ordinary victim and the victim; (b) carried the computers and monitors owned by the victim with 26cm in the warehouse (26cm in total length, 14cm in length) and 14cm in the victim’s computer and monitors owned by the victim; (c) carried the victim’s free will in the above company’s passenger car, and (d) carried the F franchiseer’s free will in the victim’s passenger car parked in the G civil parking lot in front of the above company, she took the victim’s 4.5 tons of freight cars, I 5 tons of freight cars, and each of the 5 tons of freight cars, which were parked in the G civil petition parking lot in front of the above company.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and damaged the property amounting to 3.7 million won in total in the market price owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant attempted to damage the said cargo vehicle by putting it into a fluor, using a fluor, a fluor in a fluor in the instant G civil petition parking lot, which had been loaded with the 15 ton cargo owned by the victim, at the same time and time as the above paragraph (1). However, the Defendant attempted to damage the said cargo vehicle but failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A E-document;

1. On-site photographs and estimates "before the market: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and investigation reports (a copy, etc. of judgment related to repeated crimes);

1. Relevant Articles 369(1), 366, and 371 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

arrow