1. The defendant on February 30, 1957 to the plaintiffs as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the Land Survey Board, the land survey division states that G was subject to the assessment of not less than 753 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).

B. On February 30, 1957, the registration of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s name was completed with respect to the land of this case. The land of this case was each land indicated in the separate sheet, the land category of which is both rivers (hereinafter “each land of this case”) following division and change of administrative district category, area, unit, etc.

C. On March 4, 1927, G, the Defendant’s fleet, died on the part of March 4, 1927 and succeeded to the entire property of H as the family heir. On August 15, 1950, the above H succeeded to the entire property of Australia as the family heir. On August 24, 1992, the above I died and jointly succeeded to the property of J and the Plaintiffs, their spouse, and the J were deceased on April 16, 201 and J jointly succeeded to the property of J.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. A person registered as an owner in the land investigation register of determination on the cause of a claim shall be presumed as a landowner unless there is any counter-proof that the content of the situation has been changed by the adjudication (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 98Da13686, Sept. 8, 1998). The presumption of registration of preservation of ownership is broken if a person other than the title holder of the registration for preservation is found to have received the situation of the relevant land, and the registration is null and void unless the title holder proves the fact of acquisition by specific succession (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da16247, Jun. 28, 1996). According to the health stand and the above fact of recognition, each of the instant circumstances is a land under the circumstance of G, which is divided from the land divided into the land of this case by the plaintiffs, and its identity is recognized as identical to the instant situation of each of the instant land.