1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Among the net G (Death on December 3, 1985) and the network H (Death on July 13, 1986) (Death on July 13, 1986), the Plaintiff A is the first married, the Plaintiff C’s wife interest, D, E’s mother net B is the second married, and the network I is the first married.

B. On June 1, 1974, the deceased I reported the marriage with J on June 1, 1974, and (i) on May 24, 1975, K, which is a child between the Jeonnam and the J, reported the birth of K as a child between himself and the J (as to K, the judgment of denial of paternity on March 26, 1986), and on December 20, 197, K, which is a child between him and theJ, reported the birth of K as a child between him and the J. (as to K, the judgment of denial of paternity on March 26, 1986).

L shall be (L shall have died on October 1, 1996).

On January 6, 1982, when the deceased I gave birth to the defendant on January 23, 1982, he reported the birth of the defendant as a child between himself and J under the state of uncertainty of reproductive ability due to urology due to urology. D.

The network I, together with J, died on October 15, 1984.

E. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) was owned by the network G, and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 27, 2012 with respect to each of the instant real estate 4/6 shares due to inheritance.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 11 through 18, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. As to the defendant's right to inheritance on behalf of the defendant, the defendant is not a person born between JI and the deceased, and the deceased I was born by birth to her in a relationship with another male when the deceased I lives with urology, and the presumption of paternity under Article 844 of the Civil Act does not extend to the presumption of paternity in cases where the wife is unable to capture the father due to lack of her urology, and there is no parental relation between the deceased I and the defendant, so the defendant does not have the right to inheritance on behalf of the deceased I for the deceased G. Therefore, there is no right to inheritance on behalf of the deceased I.

Therefore, it is stated in Paragraph 1, which was completed on the premise that the defendant has the right of inheritance by representation.