logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.27 2015나6927
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost arises between the plaintiff (appointed party) and the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 3, 2013, at around 20:50, Defendant B driven a motor vehicle at the remote distance intersection near Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-si, along the two-lanes, at the top of the wing-dong (hereinafter “Defendant B”) and driven along the two-lanes, and changed the lanes into the three-lanes for Defendant B.

As a result, the above defendant caused a contact accident (hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case") where the upper part of the part of the defendant vehicle, which was driven by the defendant vehicle in the right side by three lanes from the right side side of the vehicle of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff vehicle") was shocked by the front part of the left side of the vehicle of this case.

B. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s mother C, the Appointor D, the spouse of the Plaintiff, E, and F were on board the said vehicle.

C. The Plaintiff’s Intervenor is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff regarding the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant B regarding the Defendant’s vehicle.

After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Council Council members located in Gwangju City for four days from October 11, 2013 to October 14, 2013, and the Selection C was hospitalized in the same hospital for fourteen days from October 11, 2013 to 14 days.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination of the parties' arguments

A. The parties’ assertion and the designated parties suffered injury due to the instant accident, and the Defendant Company, the insurer of the said accident, jointly with the Plaintiff, asserts that the Defendant Company, the insurer of the said accident, has a duty to compensate for the total of KRW 1,224,740, and the Plaintiff’s lost profit of KRW 335,900, and mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff and the designated parties ( KRW 3 million, KRW 3200,000, KRW 3200,000, KRW 4, E, and KRW 1 million).

On this issue, the Defendants are the defendants.

arrow