logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.07.18 2017고단338
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 22, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of five million won or more for a violation of road traffic laws at the Jung-gu District Court on September 22, 201, and a fine of two million won or more for a violation of road traffic laws in the Daejeon District Court on November 12, 2007.

[Criminal facts]

1. Although the Defendant was punished for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on at least two occasions, he/she was parked in a place under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.159% in front of a restaurant C cafeteria located in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Zone B on April 22, 2017, even though he/she had the history of being punished for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

D Corland also driven a car driving in the direction of the road.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a car in DCo.

On April 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.159% during blood transfusion around 20:00, while driving the said car and driving it on the road in front of the cafeteria cafeteria located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul.

At night, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by checking whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has no motor vehicle in front or rear, and driving the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and followed the Defendant’s negligence, and followed the Defendant’s vehicle back to the right side of the Defendant’s passenger car, which was driven by the victim E (62 3) of the victim E (62 ) who was driven by two lanes from the new seat room of the same line on the surface of the new seat room of the same road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately three weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow