logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.05.29 2020고단376
주거침입
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

A. The Defendant, who was guilty of the crime, was at all different years of age from the victim B (n, 2*) and was aware of the fact in the course of drinking around July 17, 2019, that the Defendant was aware of the victim’s horse, accompanied by the victim, divided the horses with the victim, drinking water, and exchanging telephone numbers.

1. On July 17, 2019, the Defendant tried to keep the victim’s residence building in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 03:00 on July 17, 2019, the Defendant continued to pass through the 1st floor door of the above building and going forward to the studio of the victim located on the 3rd floor, and continued to enter the victim as the victim’s measures. The Defendant attempted to keep the victim’s residence building in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around July 17, 2019, and continued to enter the victim’s room in front of the victim’s studio located on the 3rd floor.

2. On July 18, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime at around 06:15, July 18, 2019, in the same victim’s residential building, the Defendant attempted to remove a locking device by subdividing the secret number from the victim’s room before the victim’s studio located on the third floor with the intent to re-convert the victim, and attempted to continuously enter the victim’s name and visit, but failed to achieve such intent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a house;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the B’s written statement and its written statement;

1. Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized and reflected, and is in the process of taking the provisional payment order.

arrow